December 16, 2005
|
Patrick J. Kelly, Esq. David Ramberg, Esq. |
Daniel R. Wachtler, Esq.
Briggs and Morgan 2200 IDS Center |
Re: Terry V. Davis v. City of
OAH Docket No. 3-3100-16925-2
Dear Counsel:
This
letter constitutes the First Prehearing Order concerning matters discussed in
the telephone prehearing conference yesterday.
Patrick Kelly and David Ramberg appeared for Terry V. Davis
(Petitioner); Daniel Wachtler appeared for the City of
1. The issue for hearing is whether the City
eliminated the Petitioner’s job in good faith.
2. The hearing currently scheduled to take
place on December 22, 2005, is continued to February 16, 2006. The hearing will take place either in
3. The subpoenas requested by the Petitioner
on December 13, 2005, will not be issued.
The Petitioner has agreed to notify any person who received a copy of a
subpoena request form that the hearing has been rescheduled. After additional discovery, the Petitioner
may request subpoenas for any witnesses who have relevant knowledge of the
facts at issue. If the Petitioner
desires to compel the attendance of a city employee or public official, counsel
for the Petitioner should contact counsel for the City to see whether agreement
can be reached to make the witnesses available without the need for service of
subpoenas.
4. The parties shall exchange copies of all
exhibits they intend to offer into evidence during the hearing by January 26,
2006. The parties shall by the same date
exchange witness lists identifying the witnesses they expect to call and containing
a brief summary of the expected testimony for each witness. The parties shall provide to the
Administrative Law Judge copies of the exhibit and witness lists on this date.
5. There will be another telephone status
conference at 9:00 a.m. on January 31, 2006.
Please call 651/284-3547 and follow the directions. The meeting code is “0131.” I will assume that everyone who participated
yesterday will also participate in the conference call on January 31,
2006. If more than four people total will
be participating, please advise me in advance so that I can add lines to the
conference call. During the status
conference the parties should be prepared to address whether any additional
discovery is required, where the hearing will take place, and whether a court
reporter will be requested for the hearing.
6. Pre-hearing briefs are not required but
may be filed if desired by counsel. At
the close of the hearing, we will set deadlines for post-hearing briefs.
Sincerely,
s/Kathleen
D. Sheehy
KATHLEEN
D. SHEEHY
Administrative
Law Judge
Telephone:
(612) 341-7602
cc: Docket Coordinator