|
OAH Docket No.
7-2500-20283-2 MPUC Docket No.
ET-2/TL-08-1474 |
|
|
STATE OF |
|
|
In the
Matter of the Route Permit Application by |
AMENDMENTS TO FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS,
AND RECOMMENDATION |
|
|
|
Administrative
Law Judge Richard C. Luis issued Findings of Fact, Conclusions, and
Recommendation in this proceeding on April 22, 2010. Subseqently, several clerical errors were
identified in the report issued on that date.
Pursuant to
[RECOMMENDATIONS, page 3, number 2. B.
(1)]
(1)
The Revised
Cedar Mountain 115 kV Route as shown on Attachment 7 (appended to the
Applicants’ Proposed Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, and Recommendation,
Doc.
[FINDINGS OF FACT, page 74, Finding 435,
Footnote 551]
Footnote 551 Attachment 4A is Ex. 202 (Route Alternatives Map); Attachment 4B is Ex. 202, annotated to identify the locations contained in public comment received after the hearing opposing Applicants’ Preferred Route in the Hampton area (Attachments 4A and 4B are appended to the Johnsons’ Proposed Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, and Recommendations, Doc. Id. 20103-47786-02, PDF pages 26 and 27).
[CONCLUSIONS, page 100, Conclusion 13]
The record demonstrates that it is appropriate to grant a
Route Permit for the Revised Cedar Mountain South 115 kV Route, as shown on
Attachment 7 (appended to the Applicants’ Proposed Findings of Fact,
Conclusions of Law, and Recommendation, Doc.
Dated: April 30,
2010
___/s/
Richard C. Luis_________
RICHARD
C. LUIS
Administrative
Law Judge