|
OAH Docket No. 3-2500-16646-2 MPUC Docket No. P-421/C-05-721 |
STATE OF
OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS
FOR THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION
|
FOURTH PREHEARING ORDER |
This matter came on for a telephone prehearing conference
before Administrative Law Judge Kathleen D. Sheehy at 9:30 a.m. on May 30,
2006.
Gregory Merz, Esq., Gray Plant Mooty, 500 IDS Center,
Jason Topp, Esq., Qwest Corporation
(Qwest) Law Department,
Linda S. Jensen, Assistant Attorney General,
Based on the discussions during the prehearing conference, and all of the files and proceedings, the Administrative Law Judge makes the following:
1. The parties to
this matter as named in the Commission's Notice and Order for Hearing of June
3, 2005, are Level 3, Qwest, and the Department.
2. Any
other person seeking to participate in the hearing pursuant to Minn. R. 1400.6200,
subp. 5, shall file a Notice of Participant Status with the Administrative Law
Judge and serve a copy on all other parties by June 9, 2006. The Notice shall explain the extent to which
the person would like to participate.
ISSUES
3. Pursuant to the Commission’s Order Adopting Recommendations and Remanding for Further Proceedings, dated May 8, 2006, the issues to be addressed at the hearing are:
● the appropriate amendment to the Level 3/Qwest
● whether the amendment language proposed by the Department, and proposed in modified form by Level 3, is consistent with the definition of “ISP-bound traffic” as used in the ISP Remand Order.
4. The following schedule is adopted:
|
·Additional Direct Testimony by Qwest and Level 3. |
June 12, 2006 |
|
·Additional Direct Testimony of the Department. |
July 14, 2006 |
|
·Evidentiary
Hearing, beginning at 9:30 a.m. in the Commission Offices at 121 Seventh
Place East, Suite 350, St. Paul, Minnesota. |
July 25-26, 2006 |
|
·Post-Hearing
Briefs |
August 18, 2006 |
|
●ALJ Recommendation |
September 8,
2006 |
5. Witnesses shall be allowed up to 30 minutes to summarize their prefiled testimony and to respond to any new matters
raised in the prefiled testimony of other witnesses. Cross-examination of any witness may include
direct questions by any party, the Administrative Law Judge, or Commission
staff regarding the substance of the testimony.
6. Except for good cause shown, objections
by any party relating to the qualifications of a witness or the admissibility
of any portion of a witness's prefiled testimony shall be considered waived
unless the objecting party, by July 19,
2006, states by motion its objection with particularity to the
Administrative Law Judge and serves a copy of such objections on the Commission
and all other parties.
Dated this 30th day of
May, 2006.
s/Kathleen
D. Sheehy
KATHLEEN
D. SHEEHY
Administrative Law Judge