OAH
3-2000-20887-2
STATE
OF
OFFICE
OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS
FOR
THE MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES
|
In
the Matter of the Appeal of the OHV Registration, Operation, and Trespass
Civil Citation Issued to Amanda Lee Janssen |
NOTICE
OF PREHEARING CONFERENCE AND NOTICE OF HEARING |
PLEASE BE ADVISED that a prehearing
conference will be held by telephone conference call on October 22, 2009, beginning
at 2:00 p.m. and continuing as long as necessary.
Participating in the prehearing
conference telephone call will be Kathleen D. Sheehy, the undersigned
Administrative Law Judge (ALJ), whose mailing address is
The purpose of the prehearing
conference telephone call is to determine the nature of the dispute that caused
the appeal, and to determine the best way to resolve it. The telephone call is expected to last about
fifteen (15) minutes, and no more than thirty (30) minutes. If the appeal cannot be resolved during the
telephone call itself, then the Judge will set a time for a hearing. The Judge will also decide whether the
hearing shall be held by telephone or in person.
The civil citation alleges a violation
of Minn. Stat. § 84.928, subd. 1 (operating an all-terrain vehicle on
a public road).
It is not necessary that a person have
an attorney in order to participate in this case. They may, however, choose to be represented
by legal counsel or any other representative of their choice.
Unless the Administrative Law Judge
decides differently, the only participants in the prehearing conference
telephone call will be Officer Colleen Adam and Amanda Janssen. If a hearing is necessary, they will be the
only two "parties." Any other
person who desires to become a party to this case must submit a timely petition
to intervene pursuant to Minn. Rules pt. 1400.8570. This petition must show how that person's
legal rights, duties and privileges may be determined or affected by the
decision in this case. The petition must
also set forth the grounds and purposes for which intervention is sought, and
shall indicate petitioner's statutory right to intervene if one should
exist. If the petition is granted, and
the petitioner is given full party privileges, then the petitioner will have
the right to present evidence and witnesses, and will also have the right to
question witnesses presented by the other parties. Even without filing a petition to intervene,
any person may offer testimony or other evidence which is relevant to the case,
but they are subject to being questioned by the parties. Generally, non-parties are not allowed to
question witnesses provided by the parties.
The parties may agree that the
Administrative Law Judge may base a recommended decision on the record
developed during the prehearing conference.
In that event, the persons participating in the hearing should have
available all documents, records, witnesses and any other evidence they need to
present their position. Subpoenas may be
available to compel the attendance of witnesses or other production of
documents. See Minnesota Rules
pt. 1400.8601 for the procedures regarding subpoenas.
When the hearing is completed, the
Administrative Law Judge will issue a recommended decision. A copy will be sent to each party and to the Commissioner. After allowing at least five days to pass,
the Commissioner will issue a final order.
During the five-day period, the parties may file comments with the Commissioner
regarding the recommended decision.
Failure to participate in the
prehearing conference telephone call or failure to appear at the hearing will
result in the citation being upheld and the fine will have to be paid within
thirty (30) days of the issuance of the Commissioner’s final decision, with no
further opportunities for administrative appeal.
It is likely that an appeal hearing
will cost the taxpayers more than the amount of the fine imposed by the
citation. Appeal hearings should be
limited to cases where there is a legitimate, good faith disagreement about the
facts or the law. The statute (§ 116.072,
subd. 6(d)) provides that if the Administrative Law Judge finds that a hearing
was requested solely for purposes of delay or that the hearing request was
frivolous, the costs of holding the hearing may be added to the amount of the
fine.
Questions concerning settlement of
this matter may be directed to Pat Watts, Policy/Legal Analyst, Minnesota
Department of Natural Resources,
|
Dated this |
5th |
day of |
October |
2009. |
|
s/Kathleen
D. Sheehy |
|
KATHLEEN
D. SHEEHY |
|
Administrative
Law Judge |