November 30, 2005
|
Gene Merriam, Commissioner Department of Natural Resources |
|
Re: In the Matter of the Appeal of the ORV
Operation Citations Issued to
Citation Nos. 66307 and 66306
OAH Docket Nos. 3-2000-16876-2 and 7-2000-16898-2
Dear Commissioner Merriam:
On November 10, 2005, the prehearing conference was held by telephone on the operation citations listed above. Conservation Officer Colleen Adam, Lieutenant Phil Meier, Kent Knacke, and Kenneth Vannett participated in the hearing. The hearing was tape-recorded. During the conference, the parties agreed that the prehearing conference would serve as the evidentiary record and that my recommendation would be based on the facts as determined on that record.
The relevant facts are largely undisputed. Lieutenant Meier and Officer Adam were
traveling southbound (in separate vehicles) on County Road 2 in
Mr. Knacke and Mr. Vannett had been operating
their ATVs along Highway 34, when they turned onto County Road 2 heading
northbound. They maneuvered around three
parked cars that took them into the travel lane of County Road 2.[2] County Road 2 leads directly into the central
portion of
Based on the observed conduct, the officers issued Mr. Knacke citation number 66307 and Mr. Vannett citation number 66306, each for illegal ATV operation on a public roadway. Both citations alleged violations of Minn. Stat. § 84.928, subd. 1, which states:
Subdivision 1. Operation on roads and rights-of-way. (a) Unless otherwise allowed in sections 84.92 to 84.929, a person shall not operate an all-terrain vehicle in this state along or on the roadway, shoulder, or inside bank or slope of a public road right-of-way of a trunk, county state-aid, or county highway other than in the ditch or the outside bank or slope of a trunk, county state-aid, or county highway unless prohibited under paragraph (b).
The only exception to the statute that is applicable to this matter is for obstructions, and that language states:
(b) An all-terrain vehicle may be operated upon a bridge, other than a bridge that is part of the main traveled lanes of an interstate highway, or roadway shoulder or inside bank of a public road right-of-way when required for the purpose of avoiding obstructions to travel when no other method of avoidance is possible; provided the all-terrain vehicle is operated in the extreme right-hand lane, the entrance to the roadway is made within 100 feet of the bridge or obstacle, and the crossing is made without undue delay.[5]
Mr. Knacke also noted that there was a
widespread practice of ATV owners driving their ATVs into
Based on all the statements by Lieutenant Meier, Officer Adam, Mr. Knacke, and Mr. Vannett, I find that both Mr. Knacke and Mr. Vannett committed the violations for which they were cited. Therefore, Civil Citation Nos. 66306 and 66307 were properly issued and should be affirmed.
I am closing our file in this matter. The record is enclosed with the exception of the tape of the telephone conference. If you would like a copy of the tape, please contact our office in writing or by telephone at 612-341-7448.
The law requires the final decision in this matter to be made by the Commissioner or his designee. The law[7] further requires that the Commissioner wait at least five days after receipt of this recommendation before making that final decision and allow Mr. Corne to submit comments to the Commissioner on this recommendation within that five-day period. The Commissioner must send a copy of his final decision to Mr. Corne. If the Commissioner fails to act within 90 days after the record before the Commissioner closes, this recommendation will become the final decision in this matter.[8]
Sincerely,
|
s/Kathleen D. Sheehy |
KATHLEEN D. SHEEHY
Administrative Law Judge
612-341-7602
cc: Kent Knacke
Kenneth Vannett
Conservation Officer Colleen Adam
Major William Spence, DNR Enforcement
[1]
The Heartland State Trail is a nonmotorized trail that runs through
[2]
[3] Testimony of Knacke.
[4] Knacke Appeal Letter.
[5] Minn. Stat. § 84.928, subd. 1a (b). Crossing a county highway is allowed under Minn. Stat. § 84.928, subd. 1a(a)(1), but the crossing must be done at a 90 degree angle. The ATVs occupied the travel lane along County Road 2 for more than a block prior to turning onto County Road 18.
[6] Knacke Appeal Letter. The 90 degree angle required for crossing county highways renders an arm signal (for a left turn) inappropriate, unless the ATV is already in the travel lane.
[7] Minn. Stat. § 116.072, subd. 6(e).
[8] Minn. Stat. § 14.62, subd. 2a.