|
|
OAH 3-1902-19139-2 DOLI File No. BC2700653/HRH |
STATE
OF
OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS
FOR THE COMMISSIONER OF LABOR AND INDUSTRY
|
In the Matter of Donald Hesse, individually and d/b/a Kodiak Home Builders, a/k/a Kodiak Construction |
FINDINGS OF FACT,
CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATION |
The above-entitled matter came on
before Administrative Law Judge Kathleen D. Sheehy for hearing on August 28,
2007, at 9:30 a.m., at the Office of Administrative Hearings,
Christopher M. Kaisershot, Assistant Attorney General, 1200
Donald Hesse, d/b/a Kodiak Home Builders (Respondent), Kodiak Home
Builders,
STATEMENT OF ISSUES
The issues presented in this case
are whether the Respondent is subject to discipline and/or civil penalties
because:
1. Respondent
engaged in conduct that demonstrates he is incompetent, untrustworthy, or
financially irresponsible by failing to satisfy a judgment, in violation of
Minn. Stat. §§ 45.027, subd. 7(a)(4), and 326.91, subd. 1(6) (2006);
2. Respondent engaged in a fraudulent,
deceptive, or dishonest practice by conducting business under a name other than
the one in which he is licensed, in violation of Minn. Stat. § 326.91, subd.
1(2)(2006) and Minn. R. 2891.0040, subp. 1E (2005); and
3. Respondent
failed to respond to the Department’s information request, in violation of
Minn. Stat. §§ 45.027, subds. 1a and 7(a)(3), and 326.91, subd. 1(5) (2006).
Based upon all of the files, records and proceedings herein, the Administrative Law Judge makes the following:
FINDINGS OF FACT
1.
On August 8, 2007, the Department sent by first class mail a
copy of the Notice and Order for
Hearing, Order to Show Cause, Order for Summary Suspension, and Statement of
Charges
(Notice and Order for Hearing) to Donald Hesse and Kodiak Home Builders at the
following two addresses: 610 – 1st
Avenue NW, Buffalo, MN 55313, and 2243
Dugue Avenue, Buffalo, MN 55313. The mailing sent to the Respondent at
2.
The Notice and Order for Hearing scheduled a hearing in this
matter at 9:30 a.m. on August 28, 2007, at the Office of Administrative
Hearings,
3.
The Notice and Order for Hearing specifically notified the
Respondent that failure to appear at the hearing may result in a finding that
Respondent is in default, that the Department’s allegations contained in the
Statement of Charges may be accepted as true, and that its proposed
disciplinary action may be upheld.[1]
4.
The Respondent did not appear for the hearing, nor did
Respondent contact the Administrative Law Judge prior to the hearing to seek a
continuance or request any other relief.
5.
Because Respondent failed to appear for the hearing, he is
in default.
6.
Pursuant to Minn. R. 1400.6000, the allegations contained in
the Notice and Order for Hearing are taken as
true and incorporated by reference into these Findings of Fact.
Based
upon the foregoing Findings of Fact, the Administrative Law Judge makes the
following:
CONCLUSIONS
1.
The Administrative Law Judge and the Commissioner are
authorized to consider the charges against Respondent under Minn. Stat. §§
14.50, 326.91, and 326.92, subd. 3 (2006).
2.
Respondent received due, proper and timely notice of the
charges against him and of the time and place of the hearing. This matter is, therefore, properly before
the Commissioner and the Administrative Law Judge.
3.
The Department has complied with all relevant procedural
legal requirements.
4.
Under Minn. R. 1400.6000, a contested case may be decided
adversely to a party who defaults. On
default, the allegations set out in the Notice and Order for Hearing or other pleadings
may be taken as true or deemed proved without further evidence.
5.
The Respondent is in default as a result of his failure to
appear at the hearing.
6.
The Respondent demonstrated incompetence, untrustworthiness,
and financial irresponsibility, in violation of Minn. Stat. §§ 45.027, subd.
7(a)(4), and 326.91, subd. 1(6), by failing to satisfy a judgment against him
in the amount of $867.71.
7.
The Respondent engaged in a fraudulent, deceptive, or
dishonest practice, in violation of Minn. Stat. § 326.91, subd. 1(2), and
8.
The Respondent failed to respond to the Department’s
information request, in violation of Minn. Stat. § 45.027, subds. 1a and
7(a)(3), and 326.91, subd. 1(5).
9.
Disciplinary
action against the Respondent is in the public interest.
Based upon the foregoing Conclusions, the Administrative Law Judge makes the following:
IT IS HEREBY
RECOMMENDED: that the Commissioner take disciplinary action against the license
of Donald Hesse, individually and d/b/a Kodiak Home Builders.
Dated: August 30, 2007.
|
s/Kathleen D. Sheehy |
|
KATHLEEN D. SHEEHY |
|
Administrative Law Judge |
Reported: Default
This
Report is a recommendation, not a final decision. The Commissioner of Labor and Industry will
make the final decision after reviewing the record and may adopt, reject or
modify these Findings of Fact, Conclusions, and Recommendation. Under Minn. Stat. § 14.61, the Commissioner’s
decision shall not be made until this Report has been available to the parties
to the proceeding for at least ten (10) days.
An opportunity must be afforded to each party adversely affected by this
Report to file exceptions and present argument to the Board. Parties should contact Steve Sviggum,
Commissioner, Department of Labor and Industry,
Under Minn. Stat. § 14.62, subd. 1, the agency is required to serve its final decision upon each party and the Administrative Law Judge by first class mail or as otherwise provided by law. If the Commissioner fails to issue a final decision within 90 days of the close of the record, this report will constitute the final agency decision under Minn. Stat. § 14.62, subd. 2a. In order to comply with this statute, the Commissioner must then return the record to the Administrative Law Judge within 10 working days to allow the Judge to determine the discipline to be imposed. The record closes upon the filing of exceptions to the report and the presentation of argument to the Commissioner, or upon the expiration of the deadline for doing so. The Commissioner must notify the parties and the Administrative Law Judge of the date on which the record closes.