OAH 16-1800-20676-2

 

STATE OF MINNESOTA

OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS

 

FOR THE COMMISSIONER OF HUMAN SERVICES

 

In the Matter of the Contested Case of LaTonya Loya McIntosh

 

FINDINGS OF FACT,

CONCLUSIONS, AND

RECOMMENDATION

 

          The above-entitled matter came on for prehearing conference before Administrative Law Judge Manuel J. Cervantes on September 8, 2009, at 9:30 a.m. at the Office of Administrative Hearings in St. Paul, Minnesota.  Steven H. Alpert, Assistant Attorney General, appeared on behalf of the Department of Human Services (Department).  There was no appearance by or on behalf of Ms. McIntosh (Respondent).  The OAH record closed on September 22, 2009, ten working days after receipt of a proposed default order from counsel for the Department.[1]  

STATEMENT OF ISSUES

          The issues presented in this case are: 1) whether the Minnesota Department of Health’s (MDH) maltreatment determinations against Respondent are conclusive; 2) whether the Department properly denied a set-aside or variance of Respondent’s disqualification; and 3) whether the Department properly denied Respondent’s application for child foster care.

Based upon all of the proceedings herein, the Administrative Law Judge makes the following:

FINDINGS OF FACT

1.               The Notice and Order for Prehearing Conference was served upon Respondent at her last known address on file with the Department by first class postage prepaid mail on July 17, 2009.[2]  The Notice and Order scheduled the prehearing conference for September 8, 2009 at 9:30 a.m. at the Office of Administrative Hearings in St. Paul.

2.               In the Notice and Order for Prehearing Conference, the Department alleged that the MDH made maltreatment determinations against Respondent; the Department denied a set-aside or variance of Respondent’s disqualification; and denied Respondent’s application to provide child foster care.

3.                The Notice and Order for Prehearing Conference contained the following language: 

The Respondent’s failure to appear at the hearing may result in a finding that the Respondent is in default, that the Department’s allegations contained in this Notice and Order may be accepted as true, and its proposed action may be upheld.[3]

4.               The Respondent did not file a Notice of Appearance with the Office of Administrative Hearings, did not appear on the scheduled hearing date, did not make another prehearing request for a continuance, or request any other relief.  The Respondent is, therefore, in default.

5.               The allegations and issues set forth in the Notice and Order for Prehearing Conference are incorporated herein by reference in their entirety.

Based upon the foregoing Findings of Fact, the Administrative Law Judge makes the following:

CONCLUSIONS

1.               The Commissioner of Human Services and the Administrative Law Judge have authority to consider the issues set out in the Notice and Order for Prehearing Conference to take the action proposed under Minn. Stat. §§ 245A. 04, 245A05, 245A.08 and 14.50. 

2.               The Department and the Office of Administrative Hearings gave proper notice of the hearing in this matter to the Respondent and have complied with all relevant substantive and procedural requirements of law and rule.

3.               The Respondent is in default under Minn. R. 1400.6000 as a result of her failure to appear at the hearing.

4.               Under Minn. R. 1400.6000, the allegations and the issues set out in the Notice and Order for Prehearing Conference may be taken as true or deemed proved without further evidence when a party defaults.

5.               The allegations in the Notice are sufficient to establish a factual predicate for the Department to conclude that MDH’s maltreatment determinations against Respondent are conclusive; that the Department properly denied a set-aside or variance of Respondent’s disqualification; and the Department properly denied Respondent’s application for child foster care.

          Based upon the foregoing Conclusions, the Administrative Law Judge makes the following:

RECOMMENDATION

          IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED: that the Commissioner of Human Services dismiss this case with prejudice.

 

Dated:  September 23, 2009

s/Manuel J. Cervantes

MANUEL J. CERVANTES

Administrative Law Judge

Reported:  Default

 

NOTICE

This report is a recommendation, not a final decision.  The Commissioner of Human Services will make the final decision after a review of the record and may adopt, reject or modify these Findings of Fact, Conclusions, and Recommendation.  Under Minn. Stat. § 14.61, the Commissioner shall not make a final decision until this Report has been made available to the parties for at least ten days.  The parties may file exceptions to this Report and the Commissioner must consider the exceptions in making a final decision. Parties should contact Cal Ludeman, Commissioner of Human Services, Box 64998, St. Paul MN 55155, (651) 431-2907 to learn the procedure for filing exceptions or presenting argument.

The record closes upon the filing of exceptions to the report and the presentation of argument to the Commissioner, or upon the expiration of the deadline for doing so.  The Commissioner must notify the parties and the Administrative Law Judge of the date on which the record closes.

Pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 14.62, subd. 1, the Commissioner is required to serve its final decision upon each party and the Administrative Law Judge by first class mail.

 



[1] Minn. R. 1400.6600.

[2] Jennifer S. Pruden’s Affidavit of Service by U. S. Mail to Respondent’s Last Known Address, attached to Notice and Order Prehearing Conference.

[3] Notice and Order for Prehearing Conference.