OAH 46-1800-20476-2
STATE OF
OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE
HEARINGS
FOR DEPARTMENT OF
HUMAN SERVICES
|
In
the Revocation of the License of Ann Hanson to Provide Family Child Care |
FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND RECOMMENDATION |
The above-entitled
matter came on for hearing before Administrative Law Judge Barbara J. Runchey on
July 28, 2009, at the
Susan
B. DeVos, Assistant Blue Earth County Attorney, appeared on behalf of the
Department of Human Services. Charles H.
Thomas appeared on behalf of Ann Hanson.
STATEMENT OF ISSUES
Consolidated for hearing
are appeal requests by Ann Hanson and Brett Hanson and include:
1. Does a
preponderance of evidence support the County’s determination that Brett Hanson
committed maltreatment by physical abuse on JRM on
The
Administrative Law Judge concludes that a preponderance of the evidence
supports the determination that Brett Hanson physically abused JRM on June 9, 2008
and that such act constitutes maltreatment.
2. Does a
preponderance of the evidence support the County’s determination that Brett
Hanson is disqualified because he committed serious maltreatment of JRM?
The
Administrative Law Judge concludes that a preponderance of the evidence,
including third party reports of Brett Hanson striking JRM on June 9, 2008 and
photographs substantiating JRM’s injuries, supports Brett Hanson’s
disqualification based upon serious maltreatment.
3. Does a
preponderance of the evidence establish Brett Hanson should be disqualified
because he committed an act which meets the definition of misdemeanor domestic
assault?
The
Administrative Law Judge concludes that a preponderance of the evidence supports
Brett Hanson committed domestic assault on JRM on June 9, 2008 in that Brett
Hanson inflicted bodily harm upon JRM.
4. If Brett Hanson
has a disqualifying characteristic, does he pose an immediate risk of harm to
persons served by the program where he will have direct contact with, or access
to, people receiving services?
The Administrative Law
Judge concludes after considering relevant factors of Minn. Stat.
§ 245C.22, subd. 4, that Brett Hanson poses a risk of harm to the persons
served and concludes that his disqualification should not be set aside.
5. Should
the family child care license of Ann Hanson be revoked because of the presence
of Brett Hanson who is disqualified in order to protect the health, safety and
rights of children receiving services from a DHS-licensed program?
The Administrative Law
Judge concludes that Ann Hanson’s license should be revoked because Brett
Hanson is living in her home and has a disqualification that is not set aside
or for which a variance has been granted.
Based upon the proceedings herein, the Administrative Law
Judge makes the following:
FINDINGS OF FACT
1.
Ann Hanson obtained her license as a family child care
provider in approximately April, 2008.[1]
2.
Licensee married Brett Hanson on or about
3.
On or about June 10, 2008, Kathy Kopka, Blue Earth Child
Protection Worker, received a child protection report involving JRM who was the
alleged victim of an assault which occurred on
4.
In the Incident Report dated
5.
Photographs were taken of red marks and scratches on JRM’s
neck, shoulder, back, and face.[5]
6.
JRM did not receive medical treatment for his injuries.[6]
7.
In a transcribed statement of JRM taken by Officer Wendler on
8.
In the course of her investigation, Kathy Kopka also
reviewed previous department history involving Ann Hanson, Brett Hanson and
JRM. There were several prior summary
reports involving JRM and Ann Hanson which were not specific as to who and what
occurred.[8]
9.
Kathy Kopka also met with Ann, Brett, JRM and SCM on
10.
Based upon her review of the history, the police report, the
photographs and her interview with the family, Ms. Kopka testified that she
concluded that JRM was the victim of physical abuse inflicted upon him by Brett
Hanson other than by accidental means and that child protective services were
needed. She notified Brett Hanson and
Ann Hanson by letters dated
11.
Holly Holland, Blue Earth County Child Care Licensor who was
assigned to work with Ann Hanson, spoke with Ms. Kopka and reviewed the Results
of Assessments sent by separate letters to Ann Hanson and Brett Hanson dated
12.
Thereafter, Brett Hanson and Ann Hanson were notified by
separate letters dated July 30, 2008 that a background study was conducted
which indicated that Brett Hanson was disqualified from direct contact with, or
access to persons served by the program due to a determination of serious
maltreatment of a minor under Minn. Stat. § 626.556 which occurred on
13.
Brett and Ann Hanson also requested reconsideration of Blue
Earth County Human Services determination of child abuse. By letter dated
14.
On or about
15.
The Director of Blue Earth County Human Services by letter
dated September 4, 2008, again reviewed the case file and information received
from child protection and child care licensing staff and upheld the finding of
child abuse and subsequent disqualification from child care.[16]
16.
A Criminal Complaint dated August 8, 2008, was issued
against Brett Hanson charging him with two counts of Misdemeanor Domestic
Assault in violation of Minn. Stat. §§ 609.2242, subd. 1(1) and 609.2242, subd.
1(2). The Statement of Probable Cause
indicated that on June 9, 2008, the investigating officer met with witnesses
who had reported that Brett Hanson knocked JRM down with his elbow or forearm
and that Brett Hanson and Ann Hanson then grabbed him by his arms and walked him
back to a camper. Another witness
reported seeing Brett Hanson running after JRM, grabbing him “by the neck and
slap him along side the head.” During
the investigating officer’s interview with JRM, JRM reported to the officer
that he was arguing with both his mother and Brett Hanson; that Brett then came
in the tent where he was sitting and hit him hard in the face with an open
hand; that Brett began to insult JM’s biological father at which time JRM
became upset and began to insult Brett; that Brett then grabbed him by the hair
and neck and began to hit him on the back and face; that Brett Hanson was
mocking him and tapping him on the leg and that he ran from Brett Hanson who
then chased him and grabbed his arm and twisted it. JRM’s sister also reported to the
investigating officer that Brett Hanson hit JRM on the head and face. Ann Hanson reported to the officer that she
heard Brett Hanson “spank” JRM but did not see it and that she did not know if
he slapped JRM. Brett Hanson reported to
the investigating officer that he spanked JRM on the butt twice, but could not
recall hitting or grabbing him. Marks
and bruising were noted on JRM’s neck and shoulders.[17]
17.
In a handwritten letter dated
18.
Reports involving JRM were disclosed to Ann Hanson pursuant
to an Information Disclosure Request. The
reports contain allegations of conflict between Ann and JRM and also show that
JRM has shown behavioral issues, and that he has lied to school officials and
his parents in the past.[19]
19.
According to Ann and Brett Hanson, JRM has been diagnosed
with behavioral problems and was enrolled at the
20.
Ann Hanson testified that problems involving JRM began in
approximately 2002; that JRM has been diagnosed with behavioral issues
including ADHD, that JRM gets angry, has a short fuse, hits people and destroys
property. She also testified that police
have been called to their home in the past when JRM threw something at SCM;
that JRM lies and she has tried unsuccessfully to work with mental health professionals
regarding JRM’s behaviors .[21]
21.
Ann Hanson further testified that JRM was being verbally
abusive on June 9, 2008; that Brett Hanson did not hit JRM at
22.
Two daycare parents testified that Ann Hanson was an
exemplary child care provider, that they were aware of JRM’s behavioral issues
and that they have no concerns about Brett Hanson with their children.[23]
23.
Brett Hanson testified that the marks on JRM’s face, back,
neck and shoulder resulted from the accidental fall taken by JRM when he was
running away from him and that the mark on his face was the result of a slap by
Ann Hanson; that JRM was using abusive language on June 9, 2008; that he never
intended to hit JRM; but that he did intend to spank him with an open hand;
that he recalled after making his report to the investigating officer that he
never grabbed JRM by the back of the neck; that he did not believe any charges
would arise out of the incident; and that he pled guilty to a petty misdemeanor
disorderly conduct charge because he understood that it would not affect Ann
Hanson’s daycare license.[24]
24.
Brett Hanson entered a Petty Misdemeanor Petition to Enter
Plea of Guilty on
4. I am pleading guilty
because on June 6, 2008 in the
25.
As a result of Brett Hanson’s guilty plea, he was fined
$50.00 plus surcharges for a total of $124.00, and was ordered to obey all laws
and have no same or similar violations.[26]
26.
By letter dated November 25, 2008, Holly Holland, Blue Earth
Child Care Licensor, notified Brett Hanson that while he was told previously he
was disqualified, he was not told why he was disqualified. Her letter explains that Brett Hanson was
“disqualified from direct contact with, or access to, persons served by the
program due to a conviction, an admission, a preponderance of evidence of Minn.
Stat. § 609.2242, Domestic Assault. This
incident occurred on June 9, 2008.” The
letter further notified him of his right to seek reconsideration of the
disqualification.[27]
27.
By Letter dated
28.
Brett and Ann Hanson submitted a Request for Reconsideration
dated
29.
In February 2009, JRM was enrolled in the
30.
Brett Hanson was notified by letter dated March 20, 2009,
that his disqualification was not set aside nor was a variance granted. The Commissioner determined that Brett Hanson
has committed the following act which met the definition of a disqualifying
characteristic under Minn. Stat. § 245C.15:
A preponderance of the
evidence indicates that, on June 9, 2008, you committed an act which meets the
definition of misdemeanor Domestic Assault, under Minnesota Statutes, section
609.2242.[31]
31.
In determining whether Brett Hanson posed a risk of harm,
the factors in Minn. Stat. § 245C.22, subd. 4 were considered and set forth as in
the letter of March 20, 2009.[32]
32.
On
33.
Ann Hanson appealed the revocation of her license and
requested a contested hearing.[34]
34.
Consolidated for hearing were the following issues:
a.
The determination by
b.
The determination of
c.
The determination by
d.
Whether the family child care license of Ann Hanson should
be revoked because of the presence of an individual-Brett Hanson- with direct
contact with or access to persons served by the program who is disqualified
from any such position, in order to protect the health, safety and rights of
children receiving services from a DHS-licensed program.
35.
The Department provided Notice of an Order for Hearing and a
contested hearing was held.
36.
These Findings are based on all of the evidence in the
record. Citations to portions of the
record are not intended to be exclusive references.
37.
To the extent that the Memorandum that follows explains the
reasons for these Findings of Fact and contains additional Findings of Fact,
including Findings on credibility, the Administrative Law Judge incorporates
them into these Findings.
38.
The Administrative Law Judge adopts as Findings any
conclusions that are more appropriately described as Findings.
Based upon these Findings of Fact, the Administrative Law
Judge makes the following:
CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
1.
The Commissioner of Human Services and the Administrative
Law Judge have jurisdiction in this matter pursuant to Minn. Stat. §§ 14.50,
245A.07 and 245A.08.
2.
The Department gave proper and timely notice of the hearing
in this matter.
3.
The Department has complied with all relevant substantive
and procedural requirements of law and rule.
4.
This is a “consolidated contested case hearing for sanctions
based on . . . disqualifications” within the meaning of Minn. Stat. §
245A.08, subd.2. The scope of this
contested case proceeding therefore includes appeals from
5.
Under
(g) ‘Physical abuse’ means any physical injury, mental
injury, or threatened injury, inflicted by a person responsible for the child’s
care on a child other than by accidental means, or any physical or mental
injury that cannot reasonably be explained by the child’s history of injuries,
or any aversive or deprivation procedures, or regulated interventions, that
have not been authorized under section 121A.67 or 245.825.
Abuse does not included
reasonable and moderate physical discipline of a child administered by a parent
or legal guardian which does not result in an injury. Abuse does not include
the use of reasonable force by a teacher, principal, or school employee as
allowed by section 121A.582. Actions which are not reasonable and moderate
include, but are not limited to, any of the following that are done in anger or
without regard to the safety of the child:
(1) throwing, kicking, burning, biting, or cutting of a child;
(2) striking a child with a closed fist;
(3) shaking a child under the age of three;
(4) striking or other actions which result in any nonaccidental
injury to a child under 18 months of age;
(5) unreasonable interference with a child’s breathing;
(6) threatening a child with a weapon, as defined in section 609.02,
subdivision 6;
(7) striking a child under age one on the face or head;
(8) purposely giving a child poison, alcohol, or dangerous,
harmful, or controlled substances which were not prescribed for the child by a
practitioner, in order to control or punish the child; or other substances that
substantially affect the child’s behavior, motor coordination, or judgment or
that results in sickness or internal injury, or that subjects the child to
medical procedures that would be unnecessary if the child were not exposed to
the substances;
(9) unreasonable physical confinement or restraint not permitted
under section 609.379, including but not limited to tying, caging, or chaining;
or
(10) in a school facility or school zone, an act by a person
responsible for the child’s care that is a violation under section 121A.58.
6.
A preponderance of the evidence demonstrates that Brett
Hanson physically abused JRM on
7.
Under Minn. Stat. § 245C.15, subd.4(b)(2), an individual is
disqualified under section 245C.14 if less than seven years has passed since a
determination or disposition of the individual’s
substantiated serious or
recurring maltreatment of a minor under section 626.556 . . . the
elements of which are substantially similar to the elements of maltreatment
under section 626.556 or 626.557 for which: (i) there is a preponderance of
evidence that the maltreatment occurred, and (ii) the subject was responsible
for the maltreatment.
8.
Minn. Stat. § 245C.02, subd.18, defines serious maltreatment
as including “abuse resulting in serious injury” and defines “abuse resulting
in serious injury” to include bruises and skin lacerations.
9.
The photographs taken of JRM’s injuries, in addition to the
statements made to Deputy Wendler, demonstrate that he suffered abuse resulting
in serious injury.
10.
An individual is also disqualified under Minn. Stat. §§ 245C.14,
subd. 1(a)(2) and 245C.15, subd. 4, if a preponderance of the evidence
establishes that an individual has committed an act that meets the definition
of any of the crimes listed in section 245C.15, regardless of whether the
preponderance of the evidence is for a felony, gross misdemeanor, or
misdemeanor level crime must be disqualified from having access to persons
receiving service from a program licensed by the Department.
11.
Under Minn. Stat. § 609.2242, domestic assault means (1) committing
an act with intent to cause fear in a family or household member of immediate
bodily harm or death; or (2) intentionally inflicting or attempting to inflict
bodily harm upon a family or household member.
12.
The Department has the burden of proving by a preponderance
of the evidence that Brett Hanson committed domestic assault during the
incident with JRM on
13.
Minn. Stat. § 245C.22, subd.4, provides that the commissioner
may set aside a disqualification if the commissioner finds that an individual
has submitted sufficient information to demonstrate that the individual does
not pose a risk of harm to any person served by the program.
14.
Brett Hanson failed to demonstrate that he does not pose a
risk of harm.
15.
The evidence supports the decision not to set aside or grant
a variance.
16.
Pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 245A.07, subd, 3, the commissioner
may suspend or revoke a child care license if an individual living in the household
where the license services are provided or is otherwise subject to a background
study has a disqualification which has not been set aside.
17.
Under Minn. R. 9502.0335, subp.6, a provider’s license shall
be revoked, not renewed or suspended, if any person living in the daycare
residence has a disqualification that is not set aside or for which a variance
has not been granted.
18.
Because Brett Hanson is a disqualified individual and his
disqualification has not been set aside and no variance has been granted and since
he continues to reside in the home of Ann Hanson, there is a sufficient basis
to revoke the child care license of Ann Hanson.
Based upon these conclusions and for the reasons
explained in the accompanying Memorandum, the Administrative Law Judge makes
the following:
RECOMMENDATION
The
Administrative Law Judge respectfully RECOMMENDS that the Commissioner of Human
Services AFFIRM:
(1) The
determinations that Brett Hanson committed serious maltreatment and conduct
meeting the definition of domestic assault in violation of Minn. Stat. § 609.2242,
and that he is therefore disqualified from direct contact with children in a
licensed child care program;
(2) The
decision not to set aside the disqualification of Brett decision; and
(3) The revocation
of Ann Hanson’s child care license.
Dated: August 27, 2009
s/Barbara J. Runchey
|
BARBARA
J. RUNCHEY Administrative
Law Judge |
Reported: Digitally Recorded
NOTICES
This
report is a recommendation, not a final decision. The Commissioner of Human Services
(Commissioner) will make the final decision after a review of the record and
may adopt, reject or modify these Findings of Fact, Conclusions, and
Recommendation. Under Minn. Stat. §§
14.61 and 245A.07, subd. 2a(b), the parties adversely affected have ten (10)
calendar days to submit exceptions to this Report and request to present
argument to the Commissioner. The record
shall close at the end of the ten-day period for submission of exceptions. The Commissioner then has ten (10) working
days from the close of the record to issue his final decision. Parties should contact Cal Ludeman,
Commissioner of Human Services,
Under
Minn. Stat. § 14.62, subd. 1, the agency is required to serve its final
decision upon each party and the Administrative Law Judge by first class mail
or as otherwise provided by law.
MEMORANDUM
Disqualification of Brett
Hanson Based on Serious Maltreatment
The evidence supports the
conclusion that Brett Hanson committed serious maltreatment under Minn. Stat.
§ 626.556.
any physical injury, mental
injury, or threatened injury, inflicted by a person responsible for the child’s
care on a child other than by accidental means, or any physical or mental
injury that cannot reasonably be explained by the child’s history of injuries,
or any aversive or deprivation procedures, or regulated intervention, that have
not been authorized under section 121A.67 or 245.825.
This provision goes on to provide that “abuse does
not include reasonable and moderate physical discipline of a child administered
by a parent or legal guardian which does not result in an injury.” The facts presented clearly establish that JRM
suffered injuries inflicted upon him by Brett Hanson on
Disqualification of Brett
Hanson Based on a Preponderance of Evidence that he Committed Domestic Assault
The evidence submitted by Ann Hanson suggested that
there were prior unsubstantiated abuse reports made by JRM; that JRM was known
to have credibility issues; and that the marks and scratches photographed in
Hearing Exhibit 2 could have resulted from JRM falling down rather than from abuse
by Brett Hanson. However, there was more
reliable and credible evidence that established by a preponderance of evidence,
that Brett Hanson committed serious maltreatment of JRM on June 9, 2008. The fact that JRM may have been untruthful in
the past does not obviate the facts of the June 9, 2008, incident where there
were three other reliable witnesses who witnessed hitting and pushing of JRM by
Brett Hanson. There were also
photographs that substantiated that JRM’s injuries were more than just
superfluous injuries. Finally, both Ann
and Brett Hanson gave statements to the investigating law enforcement officer
and the child protection worker that physical abuse by Brett Hanson had been
inflicted upon JRM. Additionally, a preponderance
of the evidence also established that Brett Hanson engaged in conduct meeting
the definition of domestic assault in violation of Minn. Stat. § 609.2242. The fact that Brett Hanson eventually plead
guilty to petty misdemeanor Disorderly Conduct is immaterial because there was
a factual basis to support the conclusion that he committed the crime of
domestic assault in violation of Minn. Stat. § 609.2242. Under
Set Aside or Variance
The burden of submitting
sufficient information to demonstrate that the individual does not pose a risk
of harm to any person served by a license holder is on the individual. Brett Hanson failed to submit sufficient
evidence to show he did not pose a risk of harm. Brett Hanson’s primary argument was that he
did not physically abuse JRM. While the June
9, 2008 incident involving JRM occurred over one year ago and there have been
no further incidents involving JRM and Brett Hanson, very little time has
elapsed since the event. Although Brett
Hanson’s disqualification is based upon a single event, the act of violence and
harm (scratches and skin lacerations) suffered by JRM is troubling. The account of the incident by Brett Hanson is
also not consistent with other eyewitness accounts and is significantly
minimized by Brett Hanson. In Brett
Hanson’s request for reconsideration and at the hearing, he accepted no
responsibility for the incident, instead blaming the incident and his response
thereto upon a 13-year-old child whom he calls a “liar.” While JRM may in fact be a troubled youth and
may have himself acted inappropriately, Brett Hanson’s lack of remorse and
failure to accept any responsibility for the incident exhibits a clear
lack insight as to how to respond to challenging behaviors. While two child care families indicated they
had no concern with Brett Hanson being around their children, it is unknown how
he will react if confronted with similar challenging behaviors by other
children. No evidence was presented by
Brett Hanson to demonstrate successful completion of training or
rehabilitation.
Revocation
In determining whether the
revocation of Licensee’s child care license is appropriate, the nature,
chronicity, or severity of the violation of law or rule and the effect of the
violation on the health, safety or rights of persons served by the program must
be considered. Licensee indicated that
she would not consider a separate daycare home nor removal of her husband,
Brett Hanson, from the home so that he could not have direct contact with
persons receiving services from Licensee. The language of Minn. R. 9501.3335 is
unambiguous. It states that a license
shall be revoked, not renewed, or suspended if the applicant, provider, or any
other person living in the daycare residence or present during the hours
children are in care, or working with children:
D. Has a disqualification
under Minn. Stat. § 245C.15, that is not set aside under Minn. Stat. § 245C.22,
or for which a variance has not been granted under Minn. Stat. § 245C. 30.
B. J. R.
[1] Testimony of Ann Hanson
[2]
[3] Test. of Kathy Kopka
[4] Ex. 1
[5] Ex. 2
[6] Test. of K. Kopka and A. Hanson
[7] Ex. 17
[8] Test. of K. Kopka
[9]
[10] Ex. 4
[11] Test. of Holly Holland and Exs. 3 and 4
[12] Test. of H. Holland
[13] Exs. 6 and 7
[14] Ex. 5
[15] Ex. 9
[16] Ex. 10
[17] Ex. 8
[18] Ex. D
[19] Ex. A
[20] Test. of Brett Hanson and A. Hanson
[21] Test. of A. Hanson
[22]
[23] Test. of Faye Nelson and Bonnie Tabor
[24] Test. of B. Hanson
[25] Ex. C
[26] Ex. B
[27] Ex. 11
[28] Ex. 12
[29] Ex. 13
[30] Test. of A. Hanson
[31] Ex. 14
[32]
[33] Ex. 15
[34] Ex. 16