|
|
4-0325-21569-CV |
STATE OF
OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS
|
Complainant, vs. Todd Dahl, Respondent. |
SECOND NOTICE OF AND ORDER FOR EVIDENTIARY
HEARING |
TO:
Chad Turcotte and His Attorney, Brian
Farrell, Brian Farrell, P.A.; Todd Dahl and His Attorney, Patrick M. Krueger,
Borden, Steinbauer, Krueger & Knudson, P.A.
On September 17, 2010, Chad Turcotte filed a Complaint with the Office of Administrative Hearings alleging that the Respondent Todd Dahl violated Minn. Stat. § 211B.07 by threatening force or loss to compel Complainant to vote for him in the general election. On September 21, 2010, Administrative Law Judge Bruce H. Johnson determined that the Complaint set forth a prima violation of Minn. Stat. § 211B.07. On September 23, 2010, and September 28, 2010, a probable cause hearing was conducted by telephone conference call. By Order dated September 29, 2010, Administrative Law Judge Johnson found that there is probable cause to believe that Respondent violated Minn. Stat. § 211B.07.
On October 1, 2010, Chief Administrative Law Judge assigned this matter to a panel of three Administrative Law Judges. Due to an attorney scheduling conflict the evidentiary hearing in this matter needs to be rescheduled. The parties have agreed to the rescheduled date.
THEREFORE, NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that this matter has been reassigned to a panel of three
Administrative Law Judges for an evidentiary hearing. The assigned Administrative Law Judges are: Bruce H. Johnson (Presiding Judge), Eric L.
Lipman, and Beverly Jones Heydinger. The
Office of Administrative Hearings is located at
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED AND NOTICE IS
HEREBY GIVEN that this matter is rescheduled
for an evidentiary hearing to be held on Tuesday,
October 19, 2010, at 9:30 a.m., at the Office of Administrative Hearings,
The hearing has been ordered pursuant to the authority granted to the Chief Administrative Law Judge by Minn. Stat. § 211B.35, subd. 1. The hearing will be conducted pursuant to Minn. Stat. §§ 211B.35 and 211B.36. Information about the evidentiary hearing and copies of state statutes and rules may be obtained online at www.oah.state.mn.us and www.revisor.leg.state.mn.us. The Office of Administrative Hearings conducts proceedings in accordance with the Minnesota Rules of Professional Conduct and the Professionalism Aspirations adopted by the Minnesota Supreme Court.
At the evidentiary hearing, all parties have the right to be represented by legal counsel, by themselves, or by a person of their choice if not otherwise prohibited as the unauthorized practice of law. In addition, the parties have the right to submit evidence, affidavits, documentation and argument for consideration by the Administrative Law Judges. The panel may consider any evidence and argument submitted until the hearing record is closed. The panel may continue a hearing to enable the parties to submit additional testimony. All hearings must be open to the public.
At any time before an evidentiary hearing begins, a complainant may withdraw a complaint. After the evidentiary hearing begins, however, a complaint filed may only be withdrawn with the permission of the panel.
If the panel determines the complaint is frivolous, it may order the complainant to pay the respondent’s reasonable attorney fees and to pay the costs of the office in the proceeding in which the complaint was dismissed.
The burden of proving the allegations in the complaint is on the complainant. The standard of proof of a violation of section 211B.06, relating to false statements in paid political advertising or campaign material, is clear and convincing evidence. The standard of proof of any other violation of chapter 211A or 211B is a preponderance of the evidence.
At the conclusion of the evidentiary hearing, the panel must determine whether the violation alleged in the complaint occurred and must make at least one of the following dispositions:
(1) The panel may dismiss the complaint.
(2) The panel may issue a reprimand.
(3) The panel may find that a statement made in a paid advertisement or campaign material violated section 211B.06.
(4) The panel may impose a civil penalty of up to $5,000 for any violation of chapter 211A or 211B.
(5) The panel may refer the complaint to the appropriate county attorney.
The panel must dispose of the complaint within three days after the hearing record closes, if an expedited probable cause hearing was required by section 211B.33; or within 14 days after the hearing record closes, if an expedited probable cause hearing was not required by section 211B.33.
A party aggrieved by a final decision on a complaint filed under section 211B.32 is entitled to judicial review of the decision as provided in Minn. Stat. §§ 14.63 to 14.69.
Dated: October 5, 2010
s/
Manual J. Cervantes for___
RAYMOND
R. KRAUSE
Chief
Administrative Law Judge
cc: Judge Bruce H. Johnson
Judge Eric L. Lipman
Judge Beverly Jones Heydinger
Docket Clerk