|
|
11-0325-20954-CV |
STATE OF
OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS
|
Meg Forney, Complainant, vs. Brad Bourn, Respondent. |
THIRD NOTICE
OF AND ORDER FOR EVIDENTIARY
HEARING |
TO: The Parties.
On November 6, 2009, Meg Forney filed a Complaint with the Office of Administrative Hearings alleging that Brad Bourn violated Minn. Stat. §§ 211B.02 (false endorsement) and 211B.06 (false campaign material) in connection with his campaign for the Minneapolis Park and Recreation Board District 6 Commissioner seat. Administrative Law Judge Barbara L. Neilson reviewed the Complaint and, by Order dated November 10, 2009, determined that the Complaint sets forth a prima facie violation of Minnesota Statutes § 211B.02.
By Order dated December 8, 2009, this matter was scheduled for a prehearing conference to take place on December 15, 2009, and an evidentiary hearing to be held on January 6, 2010 at 10:00 a.m. During the prehearing conference, the Respondent requested a continuance of the hearing date and the parties agreed to continue the hearing to January 20, 2010.
THEREFORE, NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that this matter has been reassigned to a panel of three
Administrative Law Judges for an evidentiary hearing. The assigned Administrative Law Judges are: Barbara
L. Neilson (presiding judge), Beverly Jones Heydinger, and James F.
Cannon. The address of the Administrative
Law Judges is
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED AND NOTICE IS
HEREBY GIVEN that this matter is rescheduled
for an evidentiary hearing to be
held at the Office of Administrative Hearings at
The evidentiary hearing has been ordered pursuant to the authority granted to the Chief Administrative Law Judge by Minn. Stat. § 211B.35, subd. 1. The hearing will be conducted pursuant to Minn. Stat. §§ 211B.35 and 211B.36. Information about the evidentiary hearing and copies of governing state statutes and rules may be obtained online at www.oah.state.mn.us and at www.revisor.leg.state.mn.us. The Office of Administrative Hearings conducts proceedings in accordance with the Minnesota Rules of Professional Conduct and the Professionalism Aspirations adopted by the Minnesota Supreme Court.
At the evidentiary hearing, all parties have the right to be represented by legal counsel, by themselves, or by a person of their choice if not otherwise prohibited as the unauthorized practice of law. In addition, the parties have the right to submit evidence, affidavits, documentation and argument for consideration by the Administrative Law Judges. The panel may consider any evidence and argument submitted until a hearing record is closed, or may continue a hearing to enable the parties to submit additional testimony. All hearings must be open to the public.
At any time before an evidentiary hearing begins, a complainant may withdraw a complaint. After the evidentiary hearing begins, however, a complaint filed may only be withdrawn with the permission of the panel.
If the panel determines the complaint is frivolous, it may order the complainant to pay the respondent’s reasonable attorney fees and to pay the costs of the office in the proceeding in which the complaint was dismissed.
The burden of proving the allegations in the complaint is on the complainant. The standard of proof of a violation of section 211B.06, relating to false statements in paid political advertising or campaign material, is clear and convincing evidence. The standard of proof of any other violation of chapter 211A or 211B is a preponderance of the evidence.
DISPOSITION OF COMPLAINT
At the conclusion of the evidentiary hearing, the panel must determine whether the violation alleged in the complaint occurred and must make at least one of the following dispositions:
(1) The panel may dismiss the complaint.
(2) The panel may issue a reprimand.
(3) The panel may find that a statement made in a paid advertisement or campaign material violated section 211B.06.
(4) The panel may impose a civil penalty of up to $5,000 for any violation of chapter 211A or 211B.
(5) The panel may refer the complaint to the appropriate county attorney.
The panel must dispose of the complaint within 14 days after the hearing record closes, when an expedited probable cause hearing was not required by section 211B.33.
A party aggrieved by a final decision on a complaint filed under section 211B.32 is entitled to judicial review of the decision as provided in Minn. Stat. §§ 14.63 to 14.69.
Any party who needs an accommodation for
a disability in order to participate in this hearing process may request
one. Examples of reasonable
accommodations include wheelchair accessibility, an interpreter, or Braille or
large-print materials. If any party
requires an interpreter, the Office of Administrative Hearings must be promptly
notified. To arrange an accommodation,
contact the Office of Administrative Hearings at
Dated this 16th day of December 2009.
|
s/Raymond R. Krause |
|
RAYMOND R. KRAUSE |
|
Chief Administrative Law Judge |
cc: Judge Barbara L. Neilson
Judge Beverly Jones Heydinger
Judge James Cannon
Diane Nordstrom, Docket Clerk