11-0100-12737-2

 

STATE OF MINNESOTA

OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS

FOR THE BOARD OF ACCOUNTANCY

 

 

In the Matter of

Karen E. Habert, C.P.A.

License No. 14104

 

FINDINGS OF FACT,

CONCLUSIONS OF LAW,

AND RECOMMENDATION

 

            The above-entitled matter came on for a prehearing conference before Administrative Law Judge Barbara L. Neilson at 1:45 p.m. on February 29, 2000, at 125 Golden Rule Building, 85 East Seventh Place, in the City of St. Paul.  Bobby J. Champion, Assistant Attorney General, 525 Park Street, Suite 200, St. Paul, Minnesota  55103-2106, appeared on behalf of the Board of Accountancy (“the Board”).  There was no appearance by or on behalf of the Respondent, Karen E. Habert,2112 West Superior Street, P.O. Box 16186, Duluth, Minnesota  55806.  The record in this matter closed on March 17, 2000, upon receipt of a letter filed by the Board.

            This Report is a recommendation, not a final decision.  The Board will make the final decision after a review of the record.  The Board may adopt, reject or modify the Findings of Fact, Conclusions, and Recommendations contained herein.  Pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 14.61, the final decision of the Board shall not be made until this Report has been made available to the parties to the proceeding for at least ten days.  An opportunity must be afforded to each party adversely affected by this Report to file exceptions and present argument to the Board.  Parties should contact Dennis J. Poppenhagen, Executive Secretary, Board of Accountancy, Suite 125, 85 East Seventh Place, St. Paul, Minnesota  55101, (telephone no. (612) 296-7937), to ascertain the procedure for filing exceptions or presenting argument.

STATEMENT OF ISSUE


The issues in this contested case proceeding are whether or not Respondent failed to submit a practice monitoring report by June 30, 1999, in violation of Minn. R. 1100.9200, failed to respond to communications from the Board and failed to appear at a conference with the Board’s Complaint Committee, in violation of Minn. R. 1100.0600, committed acts discreditable to the profession in violation of Minn. R. 1100.4300, and/or violated statutes or rules the Board is empowered to enforce in violation of Minn. Stat. § 326.229, subd. 4(a)(1); and, if so, whether disciplinary action should be taken against the certified public accountant certificate and license of the Respondent on the grounds set out in Minn. Stat. §§ 326.229, subd. 4.

            Based upon the foregoing Findings of Fact, the Administrative Law Judge makes the following:

FINDINGS OF FACT


1.     The Board of Accountancy issued the Respondent, Karen Elizabeth Habert, a certificate and license to practice public accounting on January 1, 1980.

2.     The Notice of and Order for Prehearing Conference and Hearing in this matter was served upon the Respondent, Karen Elizabeth Habert, by first class mail on January 28, 2000, at 2112 West Superior Street, P.O. Box 16186, Duluth, Minnesota  55806. 

3.     The Notice of and Order for Prehearing Conference and Hearing mailed to the Respondent included the following notice after the sentence notifying Respondent of the time and location of the Prehearing Conference:

A hearing in this matter will be scheduled by the Administrative Law Judge following the prehearing conference, if necessary.  You are urged to attend both the prehearing conference and hearing, if there is one.  Failure to do so may prejudice your rights in this matter, may result in the allegations being taken as true, and may be the basis for disciplinary action against your certificate and license to practice public accounting.

4.      The Respondent did not file any Notice of Appearance with the Administrative Law Judge or make any prehearing request for a continuance or any other relief.  The Respondent did not appear at the prehearing conference scheduled for February 29, 2000, or have an appearance made on her behalf.

5.      Because the Respondent failed to appear at the prehearing conference in this matter, she is in default.  Pursuant to Minn. R. 1400.6000, the allegations contained in the Notice of and Order for Prehearing Conference and Hearing are hereby taken as true and incorporated into these Findings of Fact.

            Based upon the foregoing Findings of Fact, the Administrative Law Judge makes the following:

CONCLUSIONS


1.     The Board and the Administrative Law Judge have jurisdiction in this matter pursuant to Minn. Stat. §§ 14.50, 214.10, and 326.229.

2.     The Board has given proper notice of the hearing in this matter and has fulfilled all relevant substantive and procedural requirements of law or rule.

3.     The conduct described in the Notice of and Order for Prehearing Conference and Hearing constitutes a violation of Minn. Stat. § 326.229, subd. 4(a)(1), and Minn. R. 1100.0600, 1100.4300, and 1100.9200.  

            Based upon the foregoing Conclusions, the Administrative Law Judge makes the following:

RECOMMENDATION

IT IS HEREBY RESPECTFULLY RECOMMENDED:  that disciplinary action be taken against the certified public accountant certificate and license of Karen E. Habert.

Dated: March 31, 2000

 

                                                                             

 

BARBARA L. NEILSON

Administrative Law Judge

 

 

NOTICE

Pursuant to Minn. Stat. §  14.62, subd. 1, the agency is required to serve its final decision upon each party and the Administrative Law Judge by first class mail.

 

Reported:  Default.